The Promise and Peril of AI: Can It Escape the ‘Enshittification’ Trap?
Imagine this: you’re planning a dream vacation to Italy. You turn to your trusty AI assistant, let’s call it ‘GPT-5,’ for recommendations. It suggests a charming restaurant in Rome, highlighting rave reviews from locals, buzz from food blogs, and a delightful fusion of Roman and contemporary cuisine. You go, you dine, and it’s one of the most memorable meals of your life. You then ask GPT-5 how it picked this gem, and it reveals a sophisticated algorithm that weighed numerous factors, all without any apparent bias. It felt… perfect.
This scenario, while sounding like a futuristic fantasy, is quickly becoming reality. AI is weaving itself into the fabric of our daily lives, offering personalized recommendations, simplifying complex tasks, and acting as a constant digital companion. But as AI becomes more powerful and profitable, a crucial question looms: can it avoid the same fate that has plagued many of our beloved tech platforms – a gradual decline into user frustration and diminished value, a phenomenon writer and tech critic Cory Doctorow famously dubbed ‘enshittification.’
What Exactly is ‘Enshittification’? A Concept That Resonates
Cory Doctorow’s theory of ‘enshittification’ isn’t just academic jargon; it’s a widely recognized pattern that describes how online platforms, after initially prioritizing user experience to attract and retain customers, eventually shift their focus. Once they’ve established a dominant market position and vanquished competitors, these platforms intentionally become less useful to users in order to extract greater profits for themselves and their investors. This concept has resonated so deeply that it was even named the American Dialect Society’s 2023 Word of the Year.
We’ve all witnessed this play out. Think about Google Search, which has become increasingly cluttered with ads and sponsored content, pushing organic results further down the page. Consider Amazon, where product listings are often dominated by sponsored items, making it harder to find genuine, unbiased recommendations. And who can forget Facebook, which has prioritized rage-inducing content and clickbait over meaningful social interaction to boost engagement and ad revenue?
Doctorow’s insight is that these platforms, once they’ve locked in their user base, can afford to abuse that trust. They can make it harder to find what you’re looking for, introduce annoying features, or charge more for a service that’s slowly being degraded. The brilliance of his theory lies in its clarity and its undeniable accuracy in describing the user experience of countless digital services.
AI’s Crossroads: From User-Centricity to Profit Maximization?
Now, as artificial intelligence rapidly advances and becomes increasingly integrated into our decision-making processes, the specter of enshittification looms larger than ever. The initial stages of AI development, as exemplified by my delightful Italian restaurant discovery, seem to align with Doctorow’s ‘good to the users’ phase. AI models are providing valuable, seemingly unbiased assistance, saving us time and effort.
However, the immense financial investment required to develop and maintain these sophisticated AI models – often running into hundreds of billions of dollars – creates a powerful incentive for companies like OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft to recoup their costs and generate substantial profits. As these companies continue to pour resources into AI, the pressure to monetize their creations will inevitably mount.
Doctorow’s framework suggests that once a company has achieved market dominance, the temptation to shift value from users to business customers and ultimately to themselves becomes almost irresistible. This is where the potential for AI to become enshittified becomes particularly concerning, as its impact could be far more pervasive and insidious than with existing platforms.
The Early Warning Signs: Where AI Could Start to Degrade
While AI currently feels remarkably helpful, there are already discernible trends that hint at the potential for enshittification. The most obvious concern is the integration of advertising. Imagine AI-powered search engines or chatbots that prioritize sponsored results over genuine recommendations. While companies like Perplexity are experimenting with labeled sponsored content, the line between helpful advertising and manipulative placement can easily blur.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has openly discussed the potential for ‘cool ad products’ that are a ‘net win’ for users, and their partnership with Walmart to allow in-app shopping within ChatGPT raises questions about potential conflicts of interest. The temptation to inject advertisements into conversational AI or search results, subtly guiding users towards paid placements, is a significant threat to the unbiased nature of AI.
Beyond advertising, enshittification can manifest in other ways. Doctorow points to the example of Unity, a popular game development platform, which faced user backlash after introducing a controversial ‘runtime fee.’ This demonstrates how dominant platforms can change their business models and fees in ways that disadvantage their users.
We’ve also seen streaming services, once ad-free havens, now bombard us with commercials, forcing us to pay extra for an ad-free experience. It’s not far-fetched to imagine a future where maintaining the same level of AI performance requires users to upgrade to increasingly expensive tiers. This ‘feature creep’ of paid upgrades and a gradual degradation of free services is a classic enshittification tactic.
The Black Box Problem: Aiding and Abetting Enshittification?
What makes the potential enshittification of AI particularly concerning is the inherent complexity and opacity of large language models (LLMs). These ‘black boxes,’ as Doctorow refers to them, make it difficult for users to understand precisely how AI arrives at its conclusions or recommendations.
This lack of transparency provides AI companies with a unique advantage: they can potentially disguise their enshittifying tactics in ways that make them harder to detect. Users might not immediately realize that their search results are being manipulated or that their AI assistant is subtly favoring certain products or services due to commercial partnerships.
Doctorow himself, when I spoke with him about AI, expressed concerns about the ‘terrible economics’ of the field. He believes that the immense costs associated with developing AI mean that companies may not even wait to deliver full value before resorting to ‘sweaty gambits’ to monetize their creations. This suggests that the enshittification process could begin even earlier in AI’s lifecycle.
Trust and Transparency: The Cornerstones of Ethical AI
My own experience with GPT-5 finding that perfect Roman restaurant highlights the crucial element of trust. When we use AI, we are implicitly trusting that it is acting in our best interest, providing unbiased recommendations without hidden agendas. If that trust is eroded, the value proposition of AI diminishes significantly.
The very nature of AI development, with its massive financial stakes and the inherent complexity of its inner workings, makes it susceptible to the same market dynamics that have led to the enshittification of other tech platforms. Even AI models themselves, when asked about the prospect, offer a chillingly accurate assessment. GPT-5, when prompted, acknowledged that Doctorow’s framework ‘maps disturbingly well onto AI systems if incentives go unchecked,’ and even outlined the very methods by which AI companies could degrade their products for profit and power.
Navigating the Future: What Can Be Done?
So, is the enshittification of AI inevitable? While the pressures are immense, there are pathways to mitigate this risk and ensure that AI continues to serve users effectively and ethically.
- Transparency and Explainability: Demanding greater transparency in how AI models generate recommendations and make decisions is crucial. Users need to understand the factors influencing AI outputs to identify potential biases or commercial influences.
- Regulation and Oversight: Governments and regulatory bodies must proactively develop frameworks to govern AI development and deployment, focusing on consumer protection, fair competition, and data privacy.
- User Advocacy and Awareness: As users, we need to be aware of the potential for enshittification and vocalize our concerns. Supporting AI platforms that prioritize user experience and ethical practices is vital.
- Ethical AI Development: AI companies themselves must embed ethical considerations into their development processes, prioritizing long-term user trust and value over short-term profit gains.
AI has the potential to revolutionize our world for the better. But to realize that potential, we must be vigilant and actively work to prevent it from succumbing to the very same pitfalls that have tarnished the digital landscape. The battle against enshittification is a battle for the future of our digital experiences, and it’s one we must fight with transparency, ethical commitment, and a steadfast focus on the user.
What are your thoughts on the potential for AI enshittification? Share your experiences and predictions in the comments below!
Leave a Reply